Dickish

My experience with a 40-year-old child

Hey Reader! šŸ¤“ Howā€™ve you been?

(Feel free to respond. Writing a predominantly one-way newsletter gets lonely.)

Iā€™ve beenā€¦ well, busy getting my ass kicked, thanks for asking.

This week,

  1. My friend lost his mum.

  2. KPLC totally spat in the face of my plans for the cohort, so I need to do some damage control.

  3. I came down with my first cold of the year (literally 12+ months have passed since I last had one), fever, chills, voice loss, the whole nine.

When it rains, it pours, amirite?

This deluge of bad tidings began on Monday when I was fighting for my life against a big, immature bully.

Lemme just forward the message I sent to my mentor (yes, mentors have mentors, too.) because I donā€™t feel like rewriting all that.

michael jackson mj GIF

ā€œWhen I come across copy thatā€™s either wrong or bland, Iā€™m almost always peeved enough to want to fix it, esp when it has a message I think should be read by a wider audience (but isnā€™t because of its jerky structure).

My toxic trait haha

Anyway, so thereā€™s this guy in the creator space, letā€™s call him Jim, whose list Iā€™m on. Lately, his long emails have been getting harder and harder to get through because of the lexical errors and misfires they contain.

I wanted to do something about it, and expand the number of clients to whom I offer this very service during my ā€œday job,ā€ so I sent Jim what I think was quite an elegant email outlining some of the ways his longer-form writing could read better. (You can be the judge of that, if you wish.)

The lack of response wasnā€™t surprising. Heā€™s busy, and he gets many emails to his primary address. I followed up, but still, crickets.

Not to worry!

I knew a guy who knew a guy who works with/for Jim. Letā€™s call him Dick. Dick slid in to fill some of Jimā€™s sales deficiencies. (So heā€™d relate to my itch to slide in to fill this other deficiency, right? Tune in to find out. šŸ˜‚)

Dick and I (used to) follow each other on X, so I DMed him asking for Jimā€™s alternative email -- Iā€™m almost sure if Jim sees the email, heā€™ll respond, even if not positively. I know heā€™s open to constructive feedback because he said it himself: He wouldnā€™t have scaled the heights heā€™s scaled without being willing to constantly refine his systems.

Shock on me: Dick rudely dismissed me and my process, not even wanting to review the email before gauging whether it merits Jimā€™s attention.

Which sucked, but I get it. He must get numerous requests from every Tom, Dick šŸ˜†, and Harry asking to have some kind of audience with Jim. And admittedly, I did an inelegant job of condensing the elegant email into two sentences. (nerves)

Still, I donā€™t think Iā€™m fully in the wrong as he so confidently proclaimed before blocking me: ā€˜Sending someone an email about how their syntax sucks and you can do better is not how you get clients.ā€™

Some of my most lucrative leads have been receptive to constructive criticism and happy to outsource that banal editing work to me because they werenā€™t good at it and couldnā€™t care less about learning to DIY.

(Thanks for getting through these ramblings, BTW.)

What Iā€™d love to hear from you, someone who, thankfully, responds to messages šŸ˜‚, is:

1. What your thoughts are on my preDICKament, and

2. How youā€™d proceed if you were me.ā€

Our subsequent conversation not only revealed that my approach wasnā€™t as deplorable as Dick asserted but that I had, in fact, been dealing with a baby.

It started looking comical how quickly Dick rushed for the ā€œBlockā€ buttons to prevent this harmless Kenyan girl fromā€¦

(Itā€™s still unclear why he perceived me as such an annoying monkey on his back.)

If anything, venye alikuwa ananiongelesha ka I havenā€™t been doing this for upwards of 6 years, Iā€™m the one who shouldā€™ve blocked him.

It almost seemed like he was personally offended that I hadnā€™t come bearing anything but praise for his hard-fought plant parenting skills.

His hostility and disparaging attitude were evident from the start, which knocked me off kilter because this wasnā€™t even a cold DM.

And this wasnā€™t the Dick I knew. (Donā€™t go there.)

We know each other from our conversations about Jim and his programs, and my praise of a sales strategy Dick shared that I was an audience for.

The latter led to him following me.

So, when suddenly, this guy Iā€™d thought of as the friendly neighborhood teddy bear morphed into the star of Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey, I didnā€™t know what to make of it.

I didnā€™t have a script, but even if I had, Iā€™d have bumbled through it and fucked the whole thing up further.

Thatā€™s my fault.

To enter these hitherto unexplored spaces, whose gates are manned by older white men, Iā€™ll have to grow a thicker skin.

As I told yā€™all last week, Ls are instructive, and best believe I practice what I preach.

My mentor advised me to find alternative ways to reach Jim directly and reintroduce myself and my UVP.

Iā€™m writing this as I draft another follow-up email.

Typically, such negative experiences with clients and their reps put me off them completely, but:

  1. If I hear a no, I need it to come from Jim.

  2. I KNOW this working relationship will be revolutionary for us both. (Believe it or not, Iā€™m in this for him more than I am for me.)

  3. The pettier me hopes he one day tells Dick off for nearly ruining this unique opportunity to unlock a new facet of his businessā€™ success. (A girl can dream.)

Hopefully, no mean, insecure?, bigoted henchmen stand in my way this time, but even if they do, Iā€™m better prepared to defend myself against them.

Reader, I try to make these emails as explicitly relevant to you as possible.

However, as youā€™ve read, Israel-Hamas, Putin-Ukraine, Sudan, DRC, etc. arenā€™t the only wars on my mind.

Youā€™re smart, though.

Youā€™ve gleaned something new that applies to you today or will in the future.

Even if itā€™s just the far-reaching manifestations of Murphyā€™s law.

Wish me šŸ€.

Hope. ā˜†

Reply

or to participate.